117. Legalize and Regulate MarijuanaWHEREAS, despite almost a century of prohibition, millions of Canadians today regularly consume marijuana and other cannabis products;WHEREAS the failed prohibition of marijuana has exhausted countless billions of dollars spent on ineffective or incomplete enforcement and has resulted in unnecessarily dangerous and expensive congestion in our judicial system;WHEREAS various marijuana decriminalization or legalization policy prescriptions have been recommended by the 1969-72 Commission of Enquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, the 2002 Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, and the 2002 House of Commons Special Committee on the Non-Medical Use of Drugs;WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians by generating significant resources for gang-related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling – a reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada’s marijuana industry;BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and impaired driving;BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially amongst youth;BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto;BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will work with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practices.Young Liberals of Canada
Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)
In response interim (?) leader Bob Rae has admitted to smoking pot in the past but can’t recall if he has done so lately (presumably because his short term memory has been effected by something). He says that the Conservatives are clearly wrong to crack down on marijuana users but he can’t support this resolution because it has “too many flaws.”
It is not clear to me what flaws Mr. Rae is referring to. The most immediate flaw that I see is the “education program” component which strikes me as a waste of money. The government has been trying to convince people not to smoke cannabis based on “education” for generations and to no discernible result.
I also don’t like the implication of taxing the “use” of the drug. I suspect that this is a call for a sin tax which means that this isn’t a repudiation of a prohibitionist’s almost sickening desire to interfere with other people’s lives. Since this soft-prohibitionist approach is better than straight criminalization, I suppose I will live with it.
I doubt that Bob Rae sees either of these points as flaws and so I am still at a lost to what his objection is. I suspect that his hesitation has more to do with an unwillingness to take the issue on than any substantive objection. This is a mistake for the so called interim leader who has vowed to rejuvenate his party. Taking a bold position that MOST CANADIANS AGREE WITH ANYWAY is exactly what he needs to do to re-excite people about the Liberal Party.
Despite some dismissing ending prohibition as a side issue, it has the potential to be a crucial part of the Liberal Party platform. If the great issues of our day are mounting debt and the dangers of state insolvency then ending marijuana prohibition can certainly be a part of the solution. It is likely the one thing that the federal government can do that will cut the most spending on both the federal and provincial levels. It will mean the savings of billions of taxpayer’s dollars.
With one policy the Liberal Party can claim to be both more progressive than the Conservatives and better fiscal managers than the Conservatives. That is the exact balance that can rescue the Liberals from a decline into obscurity.
21 comments:
I agree, and suggest that the CPC's stance on this, along with it's warrantless internet spying, are the 2 single biggest failures of Conservative policy.
Were they to drop these 2, the CPC could be in power until roughly forever.
bull it's illegal you know how addictive marjuana is nowadays it isn't just marjuana anymore they put other illegal drugs in it now to make it addicting. and if you want people to to get more addicted then what people are then fine do it. but I don't know about you but I don't wanna be on the road with someone who gonna either fall asleep at the wheel because he is high on marijuana which I must stress again that it isn't just pure anymore they mix it with other stuff. have you ever wondered why people who smoke marjuana can't stop smoking the crap. because it is addicting
BC Liberals are potheads? Who knew? Obviously a burning issue in BC. MJ cultivation is the biggest cash crop in BC. I see a Marijuana Board in Canada's future. Only the Liberals, eh!!!
Roy,
1) do you have any evidence to support the claim that additives are being put into marijuana products?
2) I would find your claim unlikely because, unlike heroin or cocaine, marijuana is consumed unprocessed (i.e. you can rip it off a living plant and smoke it right there and then). This makes it difficult to spike it without the consumer noticing.
3) the best way to prevent this if your claim is true is to legalize it. This will allow for the government to either regulate the product or for consumers to sue if they discover that the product has been spiked.
4) Impaired driving is a societal problem regardless of marijuana legalization. I don't see the significance to this debate.
omg you really think that marjuana is not addicting 60 percent of people who start out smoking marjuanna end up doing hard drugs and I had a sister inlaw who died of a horrible car accident because she was hooked on it and it started fome her doing pot. because she was told it wasn't addictive. ended up wrecking her life because they were mixing it with other stuff. I know people who can't have there puff of pot or two before they go to work they just can't live witout it. do you denie that the people you see that does the stuff can't go without it the local teenagers and the healthy men and women. I don't mind if there dying of cancer and they gotta ease the pain for medical marjuana is different. but the average joe I can't beleive you could reply to me that it isn't addictive. when a person has to have there smoke of marjuana everyday that is addiction. and as for being high while driving get rid of the marjuana that is 1 less thing to worry about that can cause accidents.
Sorry Roy, MJ is not physically addictive, end of story. Quit spreading fear on a topic you obviously know zero about.
"addicting 60 percent of people who start out smoking marjuanna end up doing hard drugs"
that is total b.s., stop spreading lies
Roy,
1) How many people who go on to "hard drugs" drank alcohol first? How many of them consumed water first? Even if that statistic is true it is silly and irrelevant.
2) Pot is not addictive in a chemical sense. People can become reliant on it to help them deal with other psychological or emotional damages, but that is the only way in which it can be termed addictive. By the way this is also the only way that World of Warcraft can be termed addictive (I guess you can call it addictive in the way that Game of Thrones is addictive. That is, it is a lot of fun).
3. It is sad what happened to your relative. Doesn't the fact that the substances are already illegal and that didn't prevent what happened an indicator that the policy is not working? We can debate the harm that prohibition is doing but your own experience shows that the benefit is pretty much zip.
4. "when a person has to have there smoke of marjuana everyday that is addiction." I have to drink a 7/11 slurpee everyday. Am I an addict? Should the government ban slurpees?
5. "and as for being high while driving get rid of the marjuana that is 1 less thing to worry about that can cause accidents." Except governments all around the world have been trying to get rid of it for nearly a century. The reality is that they simply can't do it, so shouldn't they make policy based on reality?
60 percent of people who start out smoking marjuanna end up doing hard drugs
I'd ask for a citation but I know better than to expect any drug warrior to make an honest argument with facts.
check out this web site then if you don't beleive me http://www.marijuana-addiction.net/
marijana is addicting and I have no idea what slurpees got to do with marijuanna slurppees don't make you high and all it does is give you a brain freeze once in a while.
You are either dreaming or joking. There is nothing liberal about the Liberal Party of Canada, much less libertarian. Were they liberals, they would stand for individual freedom and rights, but they are statist/collectivist to the maximum wanting big and bigger government (centralised in Ottawa) to implement their collectivist agenda.
trust mealain there left of centre now with Kristy clark in there . thats why the B.C Conservatives are getting stronger. this is the same lady who kncked on stephen Harper when she was on Radio.
Oh a link to website I've never heard of before. All my concerns are put to rest.
As a pot smoker(40% of Canadians under 60 and over 16) the very last thing I want is pot to be regulated or taxed.
If they want to legalize it/ return to the days when it was not illegal, fine then I'm game, but no consumption tax and no regulation/strangulation of free enterprise/variety, income tax on sellers should suffice their greedy socialist wish list.
Not that this dog will hunt anyway.
Roy ELsworth you are out to lunch, you should be far far more concerned with those on daily mood altering pharmaceutical meds or even cell phones, pot does not alter perception nor does it hinder reaction time or concentration.
I've smoked grass since grade 5, worked all my life, I'm healthy, happy and content with my fiscal well being.
I smoke pot because I enjoy it, not because I have to, I work dry camps sometimes for months, it's not a problem because pot is not addictive so being without is no big deal. Your sadly mus-informed.
No drug is for the weak of mind, but for those of us soundly grounded in reality, a little stress relief is good thing.
exscuse me my friend your lucky but pot is addicting to some people it was to my sisterinlaw why do you think I put that web site on there to prove to you guys that it can be addicting pot in it's normal form may not be but people mix crack with it now which will also make it addicting I said that in an earlier post but I was jumped all over like it never happens that is how it happens then they gotta go to the detox. they don't just put in pure pot anymore.
"people mix crack with it now which will also make it addicting"
As i said earlier, quit fear mongering and spreading lies. Anyone who smokes pot would know within two seconds of taking a drag that something was wrong with it. That's what they tell 12 yr old's so they don't smoke pot. Your sister in law is obviously lying to you about her crack addiction.
shes dead she can't lie to me now and I am not lieing
Boy, if the liberals did this I would even consider voting for them.
No point in arguing with true believer Roy. He watched reefer madness a few too many times.
Rae's being a chicken on this file. He should go with it. In fact, Harper should see the conservative angle in this policy and steal it from the Liberals.
Im wondering if people like Roy actually work for the hell's angels or other organized crime. They certainly do their bidding.
Otherwise their point can be summarized as 'our current policy has been an abysmal failure - let's keep going'.
From a medical point of view marijuana is addictive. I think there is confusion here over the existence of physical withdrawal symptoms and psychological addiction. Some people have withdrawal symptoms from even a short period of narcotic use, that does not mean they are addicted. The absence of withdrawal symptoms from stopping marijuana does not mean that it is not addictive.
The CAMH has a good synopsis http://www.camh.net/about_addiction_mental_health/drug_and_addiction_information/cannabis_dyk.html
Roy
Leads to harder drugs is simply not true. Your logic is poor - I could argue "masterbation lead to rape".
Please stop the fear mongering
Doug,
Interestingly the same website talks about how alcohol is addictive in similar terms. http://www.camh.net/about_addiction_mental_health/drug_and_addiction_information/alcohol_dyk.html
I think both are true in that marijuana and alcohol can be psychologically addictive. I have certainly known people in my life that would fit that description. But I suspect that there are other potentially harmful activities that would also fit into these descriptions. I have also known people who became addicted to computer games and played them at the cost of their education and livelihood.
Post a Comment