Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Student Code of Conduct

(read my previous post first otherwise this would make no sense)


I checked the Student Code of Conduct by the way. There is nothing in there that could even come close to suggesting what I was doing was wrong. There’s even a section defining my activities as acceptable.

http://www.utoronto.ca/govcncl/pap/policies/studentc.html

For example, peaceful picketing or other activity outside a class or meeting that does not substantially interfere with the communication inside, or impede access to the meeting, is an acceptable expression of dissent. And silent or symbolic protest is not to be considered disruption under this Code. But noise that obstructs the conduct of a meeting or forcible blocking of access to an activity constitutes disruption

There were some sections that Andrea Ambrose was clearly violating.

1iid) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of the family, friends or colleagues of the other person

No person shall knowingly or maliciously bring a false charge against any member of the University of Toronto under this Code.

For the first point I will say that the threatening conduct was pretty stupid, but still threatening.

For the second point I would imagine that by false charge the code means an official charge.

But I still have a better case then she does.

The best way to know a Tyrant is if they fear the people

There is a referendum at the University of Toronto on the 31st, 1st, and 2nd. The issue of the referendum does not have that big of an impact on this story. So, just as a backgrounder let us just say that the University of Toronto Student Union (UTSU) wants to create a new levy for a student center and I don’t want to pay the levy.

I managed to find an organization that also opposed the levy and told them that I would hand out some of their flyers. I also told them that I would ask some of my friends to hand out the flyers with me.

On Tuesday I was handing out said flyers with one of my said friends (I do have them, they cost a lot of money but I do have them).

The President of UTSU, Andrea Amborst, approached me and told me that I was acting in violation of the Student Code of Conduct. I had never heard of such a document and so I asked how I was doing that. She very solemnly replied that I was interfering with an election. She also said that legal action was in the works.

I was a little perplexed and having not yet read the Student Code of Conduct I fell back on the document I had read. That document is called the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Knowing such content I retorted that I was a free member of a free society freely handing out pieces of paper with writing on it.

She left but did not leave for long.

She returned and proceeded to attempt to block me from other students. (She failed at this mostly because I use to play such games with my sister when I was six) At the same time she berated me about how what I was doing was wrong.

Then her entourage arrived. They did not exactly surround me but with 4 of them and 1 of me I felt a little surrounded. It was obvious that the tactic was to distract me so that I don’t hand out any flyers.

They told me again that I was violating the Code of Conduct. I was told that this good bring legal consequences. They took my picture saying, “President Naylor needs to know who to prosecute. It is a good thing we know your name.” They asked me if my degree was important to me. They told me that their lawyers were very excited.

At this point another friend was passing by. I recalled that we had something to talk about (though really we had already talked about it on e-mail), so I used the excuse to walk with him.

Andrea Amborst followed me.

No kidding people. The President of my student government was tailing me. She only stopped because I started walking in circles. Even she realized that would be too obvious. (she did follow me for one complete loop though)

At this point I felt pretty special. They hand tried to scare me away and that could only mean one thing, they were scared of me. Why else would they bother?

But then sadly this was a delusion. I found out later they had done the same thing to my friend and to other students. I’m not that special after all. They seem to be afraid of a lot of their constituents.

I knew there was a reason I voted Conservative

10 billion dollars is an awesome step in the right direction.

I’m going to assume that the other 10 billion is going to go to debt relieve which would free up more revenue so that more taxes can be cut.

So me happy.

Actually my favorite part of this is the increase in the exemption. It has always pissed me off that the government was at the same time supporting people and taxing them. They tax the support they give them. It makes more sense.

But by removing those lucky 380 000 you offer them a chance at life without government support. The poorest members of our society now have one less expense to worry about.

Also I would like to point out that this is good news for students. Often students are forced over the tax line in an effort to pay their tuition. Now they have a little more wiggle room. They have even a little more wiggle room with the reduction in the lowest bracket.

According to the statement those in the second bracket will also receive 47 percent of the benefit.

http://www.fin.gc.ca/ec2007/ec/ecc3e.html

Basically this is good for students, good for poor, good for the middle class, and basically good for everyone.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Vic University Students supports the troops and rational thought

This is after the fact but I only found out about this today. I discovered the following Facebook group.

http://utoronto.facebook.com/group.php?gid=5033999857

For those without Facebook or to0 uninterested to use the link, I will summarize. The student government at VicU tried to ban the military from campus. The reason? Because the military was guilty of war crimes.

When it was pointed out to them that no such thing happened, one of them responded (according to this group) “They are liars,” Fournier said. “They do not tell the truth, and they manipulate us.” (copied directly from the group) So basically they have some magical ability to know what is happening on the other side of the world.

I was not shocked by this really. I was outraged certainly. I have friends that serve in the military (one of whom served in Afghanistan and wants to go back, Shout out! You know who you are). My father was in the military and served in Cyprus. How dare they say such things about those that defend the freedom of strangers. I was outraged, but not shocked.

I’ve heard this sentiment before. It is not unusual of the Canadian Federation of Students or their associates to say things like this. I’ve heard many of them utter such slander in person. They are righteous and superior and they provide no evidence for their words.

One post in this group even talked about a Vic U student stoning a soldier in uniform.

At this school, thanks to the power of reason, this did not stand. The students revolted and voted to allow the Canadian Forces on campus.

I salute you brave students of rationality and common sense!

Monday, October 29, 2007

The Star Reports

Earlier today I said that the Star did not think that Blair Wilson's leaving was news worthy. Well around 2:30 today it showed up on the website. So they did think it was news worthy...I still hate the star.

I'm a government approved driver

I renewed my driving license today. It was a difficult process involving signing a few forms and paying 90 dollars. This raised the question in my mind of why do we have to renew our license?

There was no test to make sure my driving skills hadn’t degenerated. There was no test of my eye sight or mental competence. They didn’t even check to make sure of my identity. (I look a lot different from when I was 16 and my expired ID was the only thing they looked at) Without even talking about my four accidents and my two speeding tickets the government has unleashed me onto the roads once again.

It was just 90 dollars paid for no reason.

I’ll take this farther. Why do we need government driving licenses?

They are not really a check on competence. One test when you are a teenager and another when you are in your early twenties does not prove a life time ability to drive. Besides anyone can fake it for twenty minutes and drive like maniacs the rest of the time. How many horrible drivers do you know that have a driving license? How many people do you know that were actually never able to get their license?

As far as being an official I.D. goes, there are other options open. Some jurisdictions even have little cards that only serve as official I.D. So that is a use that is a bit redundant.

If you break certain laws your license is taken away as a punishment. So what, they give it to us so that they could threaten to take it away?

There has to be harsh punishment for those that commit crimes and preventing those convicted of drunk driving from driving again seems appropriate.

Yet, does not having a license really stop someone who breaks the law from driving? The police will never know that you don’t have a license unless they pull you over. At the point that they pull you over they will check your record and see you on a no drive list. They would then haul you off to jail. So again having the license or not having it does not prove useful.

So here is a little contest for all you people. Can someone give me an argument for keeping government driver’s license? The prize will be a free subscription to this blog.

The Reason I Hate the Toronto Star

I went to the Star’s website to find out what was their take on Blair Wilson’s resignation. It turns out that their take is that it is not major news because it’s not being reported.

This was what was there instead:

Dalai Lama takes peace plea to Ottawa At best neutral to Harper but can easily be read as an attack against the Afghan Mission.

Afghan war takes its toll Hang on everyone breaking news! War fucks people up! Thanks I never knew that. OK so this one can clearly be counted as anti-Harper

Application process still plagued by long delays Really this is a story about how government bureaucracy sucks. But again how is this even close to breaking news? Another count for the anti-Harper.

GST battle looms for new minister Criticism about Harper’s tax plan. Clearly anti-Harper

Voters have to decide if ready to tilt to the right Nothing to do with federal politics but still a stupid article. Why the hell am I reading about some CUPE rep and cab driver in Saskatchewan?

Dion caught in the middle on Quebec OK here we are one anti-Dion article.

PM's boast called empty rhetoric Yeah not too sure about this one, but I’m thinking its anti-Harper.

Khadr's mom pleads for government to help her son I’m calling this one anti-Harper because it makes it sound like Harper has done nothing. “Mostly silent on the issue” are you kidding me? This is talked about constantly, and your son got a crap loud of money from the tax payers.

Dalai Lama begins visit This one is debatable. The opening paragraph sets a tone of anti-Harper, though the content is not horribly anti-Harper. Except for one paragraph that implicitly compared the Afghan mission to the war in Iraq. So I’m going to say that this one is more anti-Harper than it is neutral.

Returning soldiers suffer mental health problems hang on…what one second…the same author…the same story…why the hell is this on the home page twice?

Tories tight-lipped on nuclear plan Anti-Harper

High demand delaying mail-in passport renewals anti…hang on! What is going on here? Why is this pointless story up again?

So to recap,

Here are 12 stories (10 stories but they up twice with different titles so I’m counting them twice)

10 are anti-Harper

1 is anti-Dion (but very pro Trudeau)

1 is neutral but written like it’s an elementary school report.

No story about a Liberal MP resigning in disgrace.

Yes ladies and gentlemen, I hate the Star.

Sunday, October 28, 2007

an awesome new toy

The Canadian Forces in Afghanistan is getting a new high tech tactical system. It sounds incredibly cool and I’m waiting eagerly for the day I can get the Athena System on my laptop.

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=b6f54890-8b40-4030-88f6-55ab2d473b0d

Saturday, October 27, 2007

A good debate

I like that Dion’s complaint against the GST cut is that it is the wrong tax cut. He wants to cut income or corporate taxes instead.

This is a debate I can get behind. Never let anyone say that we are a country of lefties. Our two major parties are debating not if taxes should be cut but what taxes should be cut. Should we cut a sales tax or an income tax?

Personally I think they are both right.

(you can see exactly what he said here: http://canadianbluelemons.blogspot.com/2007/10/lemon-canadians-dont-want-election.html)

Jack's Speech from a chair that's not the Throne

Jack Layton wrote his own little fantasy Speech of the Throne and got the Red Star to print it.

http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/271036

This is a little sad. I guess he realizes that he can never be a PM. So with the help of his friends he gets to pretend to be, in just one little article.

Here are some of my favorite parts.

I have the honour to lead the New Democratic Party of Canada. The party of the "greatest Canadian," Tommy Douglas.

How very lame is that. Is that really the best thing that they can say about their party. We use to have a leader that people who watch CBC think is really great.

In coffee shops across Canada everyday folks are saying: "When there are windfall profits and record CEO I have the salaries, it's not right that people like me are struggling to make ends meet."

Yes, I am sure the topics of windfall profits and CEO salaries are all they talk about in the local Tim Hortons. I love it when Layton tries to sound like an average Joe but his self importance makes him sound like a douche instead.

The NDP will continue to unleash Canadians' creativity to get action on climate change.

I don’t know what this means. How does someone unleash creativity? What have they done in the past to unleash this creativity? If an idea comes from another country will they not use it?

We believe that to help the people of Afghanistan, Canada should focus its efforts on reconstruction, aid and peace.

His position on Afghanistan makes me physically angry. I always swear whenever I hear it.

It makes no fucking sense! Does he think that the only reason why there is war in Afghanistan is because we are there? Does he think our troops are doing anything but protecting the reconstruction, not to mention the women and children? What does he think will happen when we send aide workers with no soldiers to protect them?

Anyway what respect I have for the NDP is slipping away for every second that Jack Layton is their leader.

Friday, October 26, 2007

This is not new...

The Globe website is reporting about the bill that would require everyone, including Muslim woman, to show their face before they vote.

I never understand why some things are news worthy. The bill was introduced last spring. It received the support of all the party leaders and even some Muslim women’s groups. There was some reporting on it but not a lot.

The only reason why it had to be reintroduced is because it is a new session. Basically this is just a procedural thing, its old news. The public debate on this issue is over.

Why did someone think that it was worthy of 107 words? There has to be something else going on to fill that spot. Like a small town fair or something.

Confused again…

Sobara?

I was surprised to see Sorbara announce that he didn’t want to be finance minister.

He spent a year out of the office battling a RCMP investigation. He proved himself innocent and then returned to his old position with triumph in his eyes. Now there seems to be tears in his eyes as he declares that he is done. What the hell changed? What are these deeply personal problems? I thought he loved his work…what is going on here?

I’m not cynical enough to dismiss the idea of wanting to spend more time with the family as a real excuse. I’ve known many politicians in my day and I tell you there is no life like it. You never stop working; you never stop being a politician; it is more than what you do it becomes who you are. That kind of pressure can take a toll on those that love you.

But still, if this was really an issue why did he run again? Two weeks after he was re-elected he says he’s going to take a step back. Why did he commit himself to another four years if he wanted to spend more time with his family? Why did Robert Benzie think that he was so upset?

http://www.thestar.com/News/Ontario/article/270866

Confused…

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Its not about the Faith Based Funding

The Toronto Star reports that caucus is backing John Tory. (not that they were going to publicly attack him)

http://www.thestar.com/News/Ontario/article/270088

The article seems to suggest that the only issues of contention are about a single policy and some of the party’s employees. But for me it goes deeper than that.

Let’s put aside that he won his leadership on the promise of victory in 2007. We can also ignore that he put his own name foreword and forgot the PC brand. Those are not the fundamental issues. Those are just symptoms of what the real problem is.

The problem is vision.

John Tory’s platform displayed no clear direction that he wanted to take the province. He had no Common Sense Revolution. He didn’t even have five priorities. His campaign consisted of, “I’ll do the same fundamental thing but I will do it better and more honestly”. This is a fair position. I am sure that Tory would have ran the liberal style government far better than Dalton. But it is not enough to win an election.

People in Ontario do not overthrow governments without good cause. Bob Rae bankrupts the province and Ernie Eves was running around like a buffoon. Dalton has not bankrupted the province and he is not a buffoon. He is a mediocre manager but not a fool or the worse Premier we have ever had.

So we need more, Mr. Tory. We need more to capture and galvanize the people of this province.

Until you can prove to me that you can do that…I have to respectfully disagree with the verdict of caucus.

almost there Condie

Ms. Rice, the Secretary of State, has taken a step in the right direction on the Arar case.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071024.warar1024/BNStory/National/home

Of course this is not enough. Arar is still a Canadian citizen that is being unfairly persecuted by a foreign country. I am glad that Harper did not take Rice’s comments as the end of the case. The government should not let this go until Arar is taken of the no fly list.

Also I would like to take a partisan time out and spit on any Liberal or Dipper that claimed Harper would roll over to the Bush administration. Good job Harper; keep standing up for Canada and Canadians.

Tom Flanagan vs Gerry Nicholls

That's right ladies and gentlemen it was the battle of the former National Coalition of Citizens.

The Fraser Institute put on this little debate in Toronto yesterday. The question of the debate was "Is Harper's Conservatives going in the right direction". I paid 80 dollars to get the answer and here is what I learned for my money.

Tom Flanagan only thinks conservatism (note the small c) can sell in a time of crisis. He proclaimed that the success of Ronald Reagan and Mike Harris was only due to the failures of Jimmy Carter and Bob Rae (the NDP Bob Rae not the Liberal Bob Rae...they're different people right?). In a time of great economic growth and stability, the people are not willing to take a chance on economic freedom.

And so the only choice that a man of principle can make is to be incremental in their policy. It takes time to turn the population into conservatives and that it the great mission of Stephen Harper. He must do what he must to stay in power because without power there would be no Conservative policies at all.

He goes further (or went further...tense confusion anyone?). He claims that there is no evidence that the conservative base sits home during an election. The conservatives can be trusted to come out and vote Conservative (as they did for Ernie Eves, John Tory, and Kim Campbell).

Gerry Nicholls does think that conservatism can sell at any time. Only, you have to be a conservative to sell Conservatism. You must define yourself but you must also define yourself as a what you are. People sense a hidden agenda because Harper is not being true to his roots. He is a fire breathing conservative, and so he must convince the population that heat is what they want.

Nicholls did say some positive things about Harper. He said he approved of cutting the GST. He said he approved of funding the army. He said he approved of getting tough on crime.

But he does not approve that Harper's government buys into Liberal rhetoric. Conservatism can stand on the rough top and cry out that taxes should be less, government interference should be less, and the people should be more free. We can sell that message. We have sold that message in the past. The people of Canada are not naturally Liberal.

I also think I figured something else out about Professor Flanagan and possibly about Harper. Both wear scares from the failure of the Reform Party. They had such faith in it and it never succeeded the way that they hoped. So they fear that if they try too much they will be able to do nothing.

Anyway...I think it was worth 80 dollars.

(by the way I used my GST rebate to pay for this...I just found that fun for some reason)

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Ron Paul and his friends

My feelings for Ron Paul swing from a deep joy to a deep uneasiness.

The joy I think is for obvious reasons. He is saying a lot of the things that I wish other politicians would say. He cuts through the bull and crap that has become American politics. He fights for the great promise that is embedded in every word of the American constitution. It is a constitution for freedom and Ron Paul is the only one talking about its restoration.

I am more moderate then Ron Paul in that I do not envision it being possible to transform the state over night. People have to be weened of the state's support and attitudes have to be changed. Even the foreign policy is difficult because the States can't just pick up and leave Iraq. They cannot turn back time and reverse the interventionism of years past.

That being said a Ron Paul presidency would have the best chance of rescuing America from decline and possibly disaster.

What makes me uneasy is the company he sometimes keeps. The main promoters and fund raisers for Ron Paul in Toronto is the "9/11 was an Inside Job" people. The sort of people that belong on some comedy sketch about what happens when you are dropped on the head as a baby.

Ron Paul instead of being a great beacon for Libertarians has become the rallying point for every loony anti-establishment freak show. Even the Neo-Nazis (according to this blog http://www.damianpenny.com/archived/010249.html and this link http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/23/ron-paul-supporters-advertising-on-stormfront-now/)
are supporting him.

The truth is that these people don't understand who Ron Paul is. They see him as being anti-establishment so they jump on without thinking about his actual ideas. Ron Paul is not a white suppremist and he does not think Bush is directly responsible for 9/11 (though he does want to re-open up the commission). These people are just picking up on what has become the fad.

Tucker Carlson said it best here, http://youtube.com/watch?v=X1Lu0HdWDSY

So I guess the point is to judge Ron Paul by his ideas. Not by the loony tones that support him.

Oh shut up Lisa MacLeod

My friend sent me this Toronto Star article (just to make it clear that I don't read the Star)
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/269378

Lisa MacLeod is now my least favorite caucus member.

I don't have a problem that she disagrees with me on John Tory's leadership. I realize that it is conterversial to overthrow a leader. I expect that there are a large number of Tories that support the leader. Her arguments for the keeping John Tory are pretty lame though.

She basically says that we should keep him because he gets up early.

I agree that he is a hard worker. Many people have heard me loudly (because everything I do is loudly) proclaiming how impressed I am with his work ethic. Yet in the grown up world there is no points for trying. I would rather have a leader that could lazily win a majority than a leader that would work hard and loose.

But that isn't really my problem either.

What annoyed me was the way she responded to John Snobelen. She basically attacked him for being too right wing. Her "He wanted to create a crisis in education" was exactly something a Liberal would say. Then "Now he wants to create a crisis in leadership" is exactly what an idiot would say.

The crisis is here you knee jerk statist twit. And if the best you can do is attack the people who disagree with them by saying they want to cut back spending...well then this crisis is going to be pretty tough for you.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Young Offenders and justice

Part of the throne speech last week talked about toughening the Young Offender's Act. Really this has to be done.

The idea is that the youth are not rational and therefore should not be punished in the same way as a rational adult. This is generally consistent with most government policy. You are not rational enough to vote or sign a contract until you are 18. You are not rational enough to drink in Ontario until you are 19 (but you are rational enough to drink in Quebec when you are 18...what does that say about Ontario and what does that say about Quebec?). Generally if you are not mature enough to be allowed the same privileges as adults you should not be treated as a responsible adult.

The problem with this theory is that it is open to massive abuses. Gangs have developed the tendency to use youth in their crimes because they know they would get a slap on the wrist. And the youth are more willing to commit crimes for the same reason.

Honestly I have known people with this attitude. "Nah its alright if I get caught, I'm a young offender."

The first duty of the state is to protect the citizens. That protection should apply equally against 15 year old thugs as 19 year old thugs. If the 15 year old criminal feels less threatened by the state then the state has failed.

Sure in the case of the most awful crimes there is the option to try them as adults. But that makes no sense. If they are not considered rational then why treat them as rational when they suddenly do something incredibly irrational.

I understand a desire to keep one act of stupidity from ruining a child's life. But when that act ruins the life of someone else then justice has to be done. The law is not about criminals but about the victims and it is time that we re-examine our sympathies.

That all being said there should be some flexibility. A 15 year old is not as mature as a 19 year old and that should be acknowledged by the law.

The balance, however, should always be on the end of punishment for those that break just laws.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Hey look everyone a poll!

The new poll that came out looks pretty good for the Conservatives. If you read any other blogs I’m sure you’ve heard all about it. It is the hot topic apparently. Everyone has their two cents to throw in.

http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/client/act_dsp_pdf.cfm?name=mr071020-1tb1.pdf&id=3687

When I saw it I came to a realization. CFS (Communist Federation of Students) has been right all these years. There is a generational divide! Look at the numbers people!

40% support the Conservatives

47% of “old people” support the Conservatives

both these numbers are majority government numbers. But here it the kicker...you ready for it?

34% of the youth support the Conservatives

That’s a minority government! The old people are oppressing the needs of students and the youth of this country. The young only want a minority government but the old want a majority government. Isn’t it horrible!

Anyway the best line I ever heard about polls is as follows,

A party poll is “Inspired by a true story”
A firm’s poll is “Based on a true story”
an election poll is “a true story”

So don’t take these things too seriously please.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Hassam thinks that old people smell funny

My school’s newspaper, the Varsity, did a piece about the defeat of the electoral reform referendum. It was the usual list of stupid excuses and self righteous babbling (just like this blog but more socialist).

There was one original thought though. It came from Jen Hassam the Ontario Chairperson of the Canadian (Communist) Federation of Students, the former Chairperson of the University of Toronto Student Union, and pretend Liberal.

She sighted a poll (without naming the poll) saying that 67% of voters under 35 supported MMP. Then she hilariously said, “Tonight’s projected defeat of Mixed Member Proportional reinforces a massive generational divide in Ontario.”

During the “Day of Action for Lower Tuition” one of the speakers proclaimed that tuition hikes represented a generational warfare.

Let’s be clear here. This sort of language sounded stupid in the 60s when it was just a little bit true. Now you sound like a complete idiot when you talk about those old people out to get us.

Do you wish you were born 40 years ago? Are you trying to recapture the lost glory of an age that is now long over? I got news for you, you’re not going to like it but you should be told. The revolution never came and it will never come...plus most of them just wanted to get high and bitch.

Never trust anyone over 30? As the hippies learned, eventually everyone becomes over 30.

There is an alternative but I don’t recommend it.

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Yet another shining example of the Toronto Star's version of journalism

Near the back of the Toronto Star A section, there is a nice little article about the massive grassroots movement to keep John Tory as leader. The basis for this 'fact' is an ugly website put together by some random lawyer in Toronto.

Get real Star. Even the facebook group is full of Liberals. There is no real movement in any region of party strength to keep John Tory on board.

The question is why is the Star so desperately trying to keep Tory as leader? Anyone want to try a guess?

Anyone....?

Student government, three cheers for the revolution

The President of the University of Toronto, David Naylor, took the time out of his busy schedule to talk to the students of this University about the long term plan and his vision for this ancient (ancient being 200 years in this case) institution. I wish I could report on what this plan was but he never even got to it. Sadly, our student government was there to have their idiotic say.

Instead I sat through an hour and a half of the absurd and the ridiculous. Repeated questions on why there is not an Africa studies program at this school. This came up no less then six times despite Naylor’s repeated explanation that he has no control over any of this. In fact there are other avenues for this discussion and committees that have already been established. Of course I wouldn’t expect our student government to know such a thing.

The rest of the time was taken up with the “corporatisation” of the campus and the cost to student space. That is to say the fact that the coffee shop is now slightly bigger so that the massive lines could be much smaller. How are they standing up for their constituents? Is UTSU in favour of long lines and bad service?

The long suffering President took it with the grace of a saint. Again and again explaining that this was not the time for this discussion and that there is plenty of opportunities for such a discourse. He eventually gave up and shut down his presentation.

I confess I took a small part in the pointless roasting of the President. I demanded to know what he was going to do to ensure more corporate investment and cut back in bureaucracy. He smiled and commented that he was getting it from the right and the left.

My questions were every bit as aside the point and distracting as their questions. The difference is that (though I ran) I am not a representative of the student body.

Seriously how are the representing our views and interests? By berating the man on pointless crap? By not allowing him to even begin his presentation. He was there to consult with the students and the student leadership refused to be consulted.

One brave soul at the end asked if the whole thing could be rescheduled. She was honestly interested in what would happen to the University that we have all tied our names to.

At this Naylor gave us a half amused and half sad expression. He predicted, correctly, that if he rescheduled the whole thing would just repeat itself.

Now isn’t that pathetic?

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

struck me as funny

I saw this poster on the university campus. It had a picture of a man breaking a chain and declaring...

from Arauco to Caledonia: Only Struggle will set us free.

I giggled for about half a block after I saw that.

Tax cuts, no fucking shit eh

I've decided the throne speach is a fine document for what it is. The only thing that it really indicates in my mind is that Harper honestly wants to govern for a while. If he was planning on fighting an election on this, he would have been more specific and not so general.

One thing he did talk about in the throne speech that has already perked my ears is the tax cuts.

The Globe and Mail tells me that the Citezen's Coalition is talking about record setting surpluses. To the tone of 20 billion, we are being overtaxed.

I gather from the same article that the Hon. Minister of Finance is talking about tax cuts but being cagey on the details. I understand why he would be cagey. You don't want to reveal too much of your hand in politics. If you say how what you plan to do in three months your opposition can prepare a strategy around what you said you would do.

But I tell you that there is no conceivable reason why we can't have a multi-billion dollar tax cut or even a 20 billion dollar tax cut.

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Where was Dion?

I’m going to take some time and think about the throne speech.

I would just like to congratulate Iggy on becoming the leader of the Liberal Party. I’m not sure when they had a leadership race or when Dion stepped down. I’ve been pretty busy with school so I could have just missed it.

Anyway, more on the speech tomorrow and once again the best to you as the Leader of the Opposition Mr. Iggy.

Monday, October 15, 2007

On if human nature changes

The first question that anyone who has a political philosophy must answer is, what is the nature of man? Once you understand what a man (or human if you want to be a pain about it) is you understand what sort of system that man needs to exist with the rest of his race.

Before examining to closely what is man you must first ascertain if man could change its nature. If man can change its nature, then should we examine what man was before, what they are now, what they could be, or all of the above. Since coming to one conclusion on this would effect how you approach the question it really ought to be concluded at the beginning.

This is actually pretty simple so read carefully.

Human nature is what defines what a human is.
If you do not have that nature you are not human.
If your nature changes away from what is human nature you are no longer human.
Therefore human nature cannot change.

It is more then likely that some of our ancestors were nothing like us in their nature. Actually it is certain that our single cell ancestors had nothing in common with us today. Just because we were once like that does not mean we were human at the time.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau argues that before society we were fundamentally different beings. It is clear by the simple analyse above that if we were different then we were not human.

This being said, is it possible to become something that is better than human? Assuming that humanity is not the ultimate form (an assumption well made) could there be an achievable form that is not human but is better?

I cannot prove a negative and so I cannot prove that there is not a possibility of evolving beyond human nature. I can simply claim that there is no evidence in history to suggest such a possibility within a reasonable amount of time.

In our modern arrogance we often assume that we are some how smarter or more moral than the people who were here before us. Those ignorant stupid Romans did not have true industry or nuclear power. We forget that we would not have these things either if it was not for the people that thought of things before us.

If I was to pluck a first century Roman out of history and place him in our time and place. He would of course be ignorant on how to use a light bulb. He would not know about our technology; our culture; or our language.

This in no way differentiates him from any foreigner that had little contact with our culture. Like any foreigner the Roman would soon be taught our language. He will, with relative ease, be able to master the usage of our technology. He would even grow use to our customs and societal norms.

Since this man would be able to exist among us as a human, though most likely an odd one, he must have the same nature as us.

How far back then in history must we search for some creature that would never be able to adjust to our time? Sooner or later you will encounter our apish ancestors. The transformation from ape to man was not a simple one and I am not qualified to even understand it never mind explain it. It is, however, common knowledge that such evolutionary changes happen over the course of tens of thousands of years.

This proves that we can evolve past being human. It also proves that it takes a bitch of a long time. The likelihood that Humanity is anywhere near the verge of another evolutionary transformation is about as likely as me actually being able to get that Roman from the first century to pay me a visit.

So it is clear that whatever human nature may be, we are, for the length of the next million years or so, stuck with it.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Not just a good political move but a good man for the job

It would be easy to dismiss John Manley's appointment to the Afghanistan study group as merely good politics, but really he is the best man for the job.

He was both Minister of Defence and Foreign Affairs during the early days of the Afghan Mission. No one has more experience dealing with both the political problems and technical problems involved with the mission. He also brings a Liberal perspective to the table that would help shape the ideas and perhaps help bring back the Liberals on bored.

The main complaint about the appointment, as far as I can see, is that it will make it harder for Dion to make political hay out of the mission. So that there might be honest debate about the future of the mission.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Is this the best that the John Tory supporters could do?

About five seconds after the election results, pro and against John Tory facebook groups took root and began to disseminate.

As it stand the group entitled “John Tory needs to remain as PC Leader” includes a total membership of 17 sad souls. (The group “8 not 12" has 37 members)

The argument put forth by this group is as follows:

“John Tory has been an inspiration, and the best PC leader we have had in many years. And even though he didn't become premier in the 07 Election, He needs to remain as the leader and not step down. I know that He'll take our party to new heights and next election we're really gonna kick ass if he does!
I don't know about you but I don't want to see dishonest Liberal's to be in power again, so let's work as hard as possible in the next 4 years to ensure a PC Victory in 2011!”

Reading this I was stunned into silence for a good five minutes.

There is no logic there at all. No appeal to common sense or rationality. I just “know” that next time we’ll do better. I would say that we couldn’t hardly do any worse but John Tory proved me wrong the last time I said that.

I do indeed want to get the dishonest Liberals out of power. I also want to get rid of the tax raising, high spending, and oppressive smoking laws Liberals out of power.

Also what was more inspirational about John Tory? The fact that he backed down from his principled stance on education or that the NDP were willing to give a more immediate tax cut than he was?

I agree that we should “work as hard as possible for next 4 years to ensure a PC Victory in 2011" and I think that John Tory will make an awesome fundraiser for the party.

Tim Hudak should make sure to hire him.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

I remember John Tory...

…I met him years ago. It was shortly after the 2004 Federal Election. It was an event put on by Peter Van Loan, who was not yet a Minister or even sworn in as an MP.

I remember that he was an honest man. I talked to him briefly at that Shoeless Joes and I was impressed by him. He said things that I liked and wanted to hear. He said that being a conservative did not mean confrontation. The bloody battles of Mike Harris were over and the foolishness of Ernie Eves was well in the past. It was time for a new day, John Tory would lead the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario.

I remember he said he could win a seat in Toronto.

I remember the campaign. It was exciting and fun. I met many new people and made a few of what I hope will be life long friends. There was an energy in the air; a spirit of optimism about where this party was going. We needed that after everyone’s least favourite Ernie had done his best to destroy the party.

I remember the convention. It was long and boring and Rob Allan almost burst my ear drum with his whistling. Yet we won and it was fantastic. Even to this day, though things are hardly the same, I still think of that celebration with a smile. Yes it was me who threw up in the toilet.

I remember the Niagara Falls convention. It was obvious at this point that we had made the right choice in our leader. The party was back. The debt was being wiped out faster than anyone thought possible. We were strong again and looking foreword to growing stronger. Even Flaherty supporters sheepishly admitted that Tory had not been a disaster.

I remember that it was there that the first seed of warning appeared. It was here that the party began to say, “We cannot announce the policy because the Liberals would steal that policy.” So what? If our policies are implemented doesn’t that mean we won? But no one said that too loudly. It was an optimistic time.

I remember my faith in John Tory being eaten away. I cannot say that there was one thing in particular that did it. I don’t think I even realized it was happening at the time. I did not know what he stood for. But the clues were there. He seamed never to object to what Dalton was doing merely objecting to the specifics of how he was doing it. It became apparent that his philosophy to government was not all that different from the Liberal Premier.

I remember that the whole focus of the party, even then, was about him and him being leader. We were no longer the Progressive Conservatives but we were John Tory’s PCs. I was a member of John Tory’s PC Party and I did not recall having signed up to such an organization. It was like we were pretending not to be conservative. Candidates in bi-elections were told to run away from the Harris legacy. We abandoned you Harris and now it is only history that can vindicate you.

I remember when my faith broke. It was at the Campus Conservative convention of 2007. He stood in front of the most right wing members of the party. If there was a place to be a fire breathing conservative it was in that room. Instead he spoke to us about autism and the immoral illegal health tax that would be phased out in four years. Is that why you wanted to be Premier John? To help kids with autism and give small tax cuts?

I remember that at that convention I predicted he would only win 31 seats in the election.

I remember when he announced the policy. I remember walking into that giant hall thinking to myself, “He can win me back. Just give me something John, anything and I will follow you.” Instead he forced the most conservative MPPs to read out the Communist Manifesto; Increased spending with no real tax cuts; Increased regulations with no shrinking of the government; and of course bringing fairness to the faith based schools.

I remember complaining that I would not vote for the PCs. I said that I would not work for them I would give them no aide in what I saw as a worthless fight. I was only grumbling and showing my discontent. I felt betrayed by Tory and by Tories. This was not the leader or the party I wanted. I felt like I had been tricked and I felt foolish.

I remember that I did work on the campaign and I did vote for the PCs. I did so because I still believed in the party and I still knew that John Tory was a good man. He would make a decent Premier or at the very least a better Premier. And you never know, perhaps I, or liked minded individuals, would have been able to influence his thinking and push him towards our own views.

I remember that we lost as bad as Ernie Eves.

I remember that you told as that Leadership Mattered.

I remember that you told us you could win in 4 years not in 8.

I promise you, Mr. Tory, that all this I will remember in February and all this I will remind my comrades in the party.

So take some friendly advice. Tomorrow at your press conference, announce that you wish to spend time with the grandchild that is now on its way. Say that you fought hard to renew the party and we are in better shape then we were four years ago, which is true.

And then say you are leaving.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Sigh

http://crux-of-the-matter.com/?p=384

paying doctors for their job

Doctors get the shaft in the universal health care. A certain fat person may pretend otherwise but it is the truth. For years doctors would provide care that they were not reimbursed for. Nutty patience in a panic because their arm is sore call doctors for comfort and security. Doctors being the good people that they generally are, they are happy to help.

Ultimately, however, they are professionals that should be reimbursed for their trained opinion. Which is why I'm happy to see this charging service is filling that gap and helping doctors.

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=7bd77654-6c6b-4066-8188-6df011bbabc7&p=2

Ontario Election Day

I come to you live from the office of Pamela Taylor, John Tory's PC candidate for Toronto-Centre. This is where I'm going to be for this day, fighting the good fight to make Track Right do what I want it to do.

I'm not going to make predictions on what will happen because I always feel that its pointless to do so on election day, the truth will reveal itself by the end of the day.

I'm also not going to get one last shot against MMP. I will have my heart in my throat all day until I know the result of that one. But that's what election day is for me and many others. So much time and effort is now in the hands of the people.

I will take this day to remind people that our system does work. For all our cynicism and detachment, today the people of Ontario will choice their leader. Not many times in not many places of our world and history do the people have an honest choice. Now we have three.

I have been known to rant about the faults of democracy and the stupid ignorance of the masses. The truth? No other system ever made allows a citizen directed non-violent overthrow of the government. And that, my brothers and sisters in freedom, is nothing that we should take for granted.

Thursday, October 4, 2007

A Sonnet for the Senate

I got bored during a very dry French Canadian History class (My prof is presenting everything in the wrong light. The 1837 rebellion was a liberal uprising not an ethnic uprising). My solution to this boredom was to write a sonnet about Senate Reform. The Iambic gets a little sketchy but here it is. I call it "The Red Chamber Blues"

Mister Speaker I rise today to say
that the other place is now out to date;
that is, we the people have gone astray,
oligarchy exists in this our state.

reform you cry out to those in By-Town
Reform voted the cowboys of the west.
What must be done to bring the Senate down?
Mister Harper are you up to the test?

or is it chaos we are asking?
Will House deadlock destroy our politics?
Traditions destroyed, all will be fighting;
Parliamentarians with bags of tricks

Abolish! Get rid of the other place
never create something to take its place

Elections Ontario's Five Questions

Elections Ontario finally has its head out of its ass and is doing something to promote the fact that there is a referendum. They handed my a pamphlet that fairly describes both systems. They also asked the voter five questions to help guide their decision.

Frankly I don't think they should have done that. The voter is more then capable of deciding on what basis they vote, even if its a coin toss.

The questions, however, aren't too bad, and I figure I should answer them:

1) Which System will provide an effective government?

Neither really. The effective government would depend on the people elected and circumstances of the time. The question should be which would tend to proved effective government. Even then you have to ask what effective means. If I assume they mean a government that is able to accomplish what they were elected to do, the answer is pretty clearly FPTP. If you consider the problems that Harper is having with his agenda even though his opposition is pretty weak, it is easy to see that a minority government takes longer to take action.

2) Which system will improve voter participation for a truer democracy?

Neither. This is my least favorite question. Higher participation does not mean truer democracy. If 90% people vote but their vote is irrelevant, that is not democracy.

Also New Zealand proved that fiddling with the electoral system does not increase voter turnout. It is an international phenomenon. I am sure I'll dedicate a post to the reasons why it exists but for now suffice to say that this is not a cure.

3) Which System is simple and practical?

FPTP. My favorite part of this election so far is when during a debate two Ph.Ds got into an argument on what the exact system means and how it will work. It became clear that neither really knew. So if two people that spend their life studying these things are clueless, how the hell you expect the masses to figure it out?

4) Which system will hold policy makers accountable for their decisions?

FPTP. Putting aside that there will be MPPs that are accountable to none of the electorates, the parties themselves will be less accountable. It would become easy to blame something going wrong or a unpopular policy on the other political parties. One big problem with spreading power out is that the people no longer know who to blame. Also it would be easier to break promises. A leader could say that they tried but in order to govern they had to give up on an idea temporarily, and who can say if it would be the truth?

5) Which system represents the wishes of the voters as fairly as possible?

FPTP. My reasoning for this could best be read in my previous post "Tyranny of the 3%". Basically if small percentage of the popular vote goes to the party that holds the balance of power it is that small percentage that holds the rest hostage. They could enact policies that are only supported by 3% of the electorate.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Laptops and Cooks

The most horrible thing imaginable has happened yesterday, my laptop broke.

It is amazing how much of my life revolved around that thing and how much of my life is on it. I have replaced it with a green notebook. But for some reason the notebook won't play music or allow me to check my facebook...This is my way of saying that if I don't post as often as I once did it is because I have been reduced to checking the internet at Robarts. (Robarts is the giant Turkey building on the UofT campus that is sinking because for some reason the engineers that built it didn't think that books were heavy)

Putting that aside for a moment (though the tears still be fresh) I thought you people would like to know another example of government stupidity.

Being a cook is considered by our government to be a trade profession and like all trade professions there is a government exam that you can take. The purpose of these exams are usually so that someone hiring a tradesmen could be assured of some basic level of knowledge or competence.

On the exam for the cook they asked how you would make a nacho plate. Seriously what kind of idiot doesn't know how to do that. I was making nacho plates before I could confidently tie my shoes. The best equivalent would be asking a plumber what way shit goes.

Here is a professional cook. Not just some guy in a kitchen but someone that has spent years at a culinary school and more years as an apprentice. Have you ever met one of these people? They can name every type of cheese and could describe each flavor. They know how to turn beeforonie into a delicacy by adding the right spices. They are the gods of food and the masters of delight.

All it takes to be seen as an equal to these mightiest of artists by the government is to know how to melt cheese.